Carré Forensics #1: Reading a scarf like an archive

Hello again from Swiss_Gems :waving_hand:

When I posted the Census, I had about 60 carrés. I’m now past 120, and the most useful skill I’ve built along the way isn’t spotting a grail. It’s dating a scarf from what the silk itself tells you.

So I’m starting a small series. Here’s my 60-second checklist:

  1. The © mark. It’s missing on early pieces. My 1960 Les Poulains (de Poret) carries only “HERMÈS-PARIS”. That absence is the reason it has never been confused with a later reissue.

  2. Raking light. Hold the scarf at a low angle to a lamp. Jacquards reveal what’s woven into them: the bees in Ledoux’s Napoléon, the wire-mesh damassé in Héron’s Grand Vent. A printed reissue shows nothing.

  3. The hem. It should be rolled toward the printed side and hand-stitched. A flat or machine-sewn edge ends the conversation.

  4. The small “S”. A stamp near the tag means a staff or sale piece. My Passementerie has one. It’s still lovely, but you should disclose it on any resale.

  5. The care tag. Tags from different eras look different, and many were cut off by their first owners. A missing tag on a 1960s piece is normal, not a red flag.

Your turn. Post a photo of the corner, signature or hem of your oldest scarf, and let’s date it together. I’ll try to answer every one.

Next time: Carré Forensics #2: artists who hide things in their designs (yes, Annie Faivre’s monkey).

— Swiss_Gems :switzerland:

Hello Swiss Gems!

OK, I’d be grateful for your views on the attached. Bought second (third?) hand many years ago, I think / think it is an original issue or a second issue of (I’m sure about the next bit) Brides de Galak. What interests me is the care tag. And yes, I removed care tags from the first five or ten scarves I bought new myself, before I gave up. Wish I hadn’t!

Many thanks Carolyn